Carnegie Council could limit parking on Beechwood Avenue |

Carnegie Council could limit parking on Beechwood Avenue

In an attempt to alleviate a parking shortage on Beechwood Avenue, Carnegie Council could impose two-hour time limits on parking.

Council this week unanimously voted to advertise an ordinance with the restrictions. They could vote on the ordinance at a July 10 meeting.

The ordinance would limit parking on both sides of Beechwood between Home Street and Capital Drive to two hours.

Home Street is located behind the Andrew Carnegie Free Library & Music Hall, which this month began a two-year project to create Library Park. This summer’s work has closed off the parking lot of the library and music hall, forcing patrons to park on the hillside near the facility. Music hall patrons for evening performances are asked to use a free shuttle from the public parking lot at Main and Pine streets.

Under the borough’s proposal, parking would be limited only on the east side, and to two hours, between Home Avenue and Williams Way.

Council member Michael Sarsfield said if the ordinance is approved, residents of Beechwood Avenue will be exempt. He said they will be issued permits for their parking.

Sarsfield also said Carnegie Police will enforce the ordinance when a resident complains of a violation, but will not monitor the street for violators.

If approved, the parking ordinance will have a six-month sunset provision. If council members are not satisfied with the results they could let the ordinance expire. Or, if they wish, they can make it permanent.

Eric Eisert is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.