Carlynton Jr./Sr. High School taken off low-performing list |

Carlynton Jr./Sr. High School taken off low-performing list

Carlynton School District
Carlynton Junior-Senior High School

Carlynton Junior/Senior High School is no longer on the state’s list as a lowest-performing school.

Edward Mantich, the district’s test coordinator, curriculum supervisor and data coach, made the announcement at the school board meeting June 25.

Mantich said the efforts of the faculty and staff at the junior-senior high school made it possible for students to achieve better scores in English language arts and math.

The state uses scores either from the Keystone Exams, PASA or PSSA to determine the performance of each school. Mantich said the junior-senior high school is at a disadvantage because the scores at both the junior high and senior high grade levels are combined to get an average score. The school was the only building in the district to be on the list.

Mantich said the staff looked at test data and curriculum offerings to develop ways to help students improve.

“It’s a credit to the faculty and staff. They worked very hard,” Mantich said.

The removal of the lowest-achieving school designation also ends eligibility in the Opportunity Scholarship Tax Credit Program. Students living within the boundaries of a low-achieving school are eligible to apply for a scholarship to attend another public or nonpublic school.

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.