Carnegie Park, police among departments seeing funded projects in 2017 budget |

Carnegie Park, police among departments seeing funded projects in 2017 budget

The $6.4 million Carnegie budget for 2017 includes money to update the bathrooms in Carnegie Park and make shelter repairs, and also will give the police department a new computer system and two or three electronic speed enforcement signs.

“There’s two things council members always hear from residents: ‘When are you going to pave my street?’ and ‘How are you going to slow down the cars driving on my street once you pave my street?’” Carnegie Council President Pat Catena said.

The budget also includes $70,000 for the Andrew Carnegie Free Library and Music Hall to be used for operational expenses.

“Overall, it’s a very solid budget,” Catena said. “The revenue is increasing. We saw from 2014-15, about a $125,000 increase in revenue projection. This year, there’s been a $225,000 increase in revenue.”

The revenue increase stems from tax and parking collection, leaders said.

An ordinance for companies that open streets is adding an additional $70,000 in revenue, Catena said.

While the budget is advertised at $6.4 million, the operating fund will be $5.4 million to account for the borough’s Tax Anticipation Loan, which is $1 million.

“We take out a loan for the taxes that we will get in the future,” Mayor Jack Kobistek said. “The taxes are not taken out until later on in the year. That gets ruled into the budget, too. It’s money in and money out.”

Matthew Peaslee is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.