ShareThis Page
Permit parking concern for some residents of Heidelberg |

Permit parking concern for some residents of Heidelberg

| Monday, October 3, 2016 2:40 p.m

Heidelberg Council members tabled an ordinance last week that would require permitted parking on some borough streets, including Washington Pike.

More than two dozen people attended last week’s meeting, voicing concerns about the proposal to restrict parking on Route 50 to a two-hour limit from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. Council agreed to further discuss the proposal next month.

Residents on affected streets would receive parking permit stickers at no cost that would be utilized during those hours.

Officials said that after parking spaces are filled at Port Authority of Allegheny County’s Park and Ride lot along Route 50 in Collier, motorists are coming to park in Heidelberg.

Council President Carrie Nolan said traffic has increased on the stretch of Route 50 through the borough.

“The intent of this ordinance is not to infringe on the residents. It is to get the commuters…that are parked on Route 50 and are there all day long,” she said. “What is happening is the commuter lot down across from the (Chartiers Valley) high school is full and they’re coming down here.”

Council members said wording in the ordinance would be changed so residents can receive more than the proposed maximum of two permits per household.

“The vision of this council is to be a proactive council. It is not to impede on the residents. That is why we are planning the permit parking for residents only for free. It is not a charge,” Nolan said.

Nolan said parking permit stickers would be provided to residents with a valid driver’s license. Households also would receive parking permits for use by visitors.

Councilman Ray Losego told council more than two permits should be issued per household to account for situations such as college students who come home.

Solicitor Anthony Colangelo said after council approves the ordinance, it would need to be approved by Mayor Ken LaSota before it is enacted and becomes effective after a 60-day waiting period.

Nolan said the ordinance would be enforced by the Heidelberg Police Department.

LaSota said he had “significant reservations” regarding the proposed ordinance, and it would be a challenge for Heidelberg police officers to “realistically monitor” and enforce parking restrictions on Route 50 and side streets.

“That would really be stretching the resources of the police department to monitor this,” he said. LaSota also expressed concerns about “no parking” and other signage costs associated with the ordinance.

David Mayernik Jr. is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7975 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.