Sharpsburg targets blighted homes for demolition |
Fox Chapel

Sharpsburg targets blighted homes for demolition

Tawnya Panizzi
Christine Manganas | For the Tribune-Review
Sharpsburg municipal building

At least three blighted homes in Sharpsburg will be razed as officials try to erase eyesores and safety hazards from the neighborhood.

The borough was awarded $55,000 through the Allegheny County Community Development Block Grant program to pay for demolition.

“It’s a huge impact,” councilman Jon Jaso said. “The money will help us reduce another three or four blighted properties to help towards our revitalization era.”

At its peak, the borough had more than 200 dilapidated properties that needed to be targeted, Jaso said.

Today, there are less than 20 thanks to Sharpsburg’s participation in the Allegheny County Tri-COG Land Bank to address vacated, blighted or condemned homes.

Manager Bill Rossey said there are no details for upcoming work.

“The properties have yet to be decided,” he said.

Jaso is eager to move forward with removing blighted properties so council can review options for future development. He imagines some of the properties will become green space or new single-family homes.

“Or, maybe even a couple tiny houses,” he said. “We can decide the best thing for the property.”

The block grant comes just after Sharpsburg officials announced last week that the borough will get a $500,000 federal grant to revitalize Main Street.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, [email protected] or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.