Sharpsburg’s Dancing Gnome in running for USA Today’s 10 Best New Breweries |
Valley News Dispatch

Sharpsburg’s Dancing Gnome in running for USA Today’s 10 Best New Breweries

Tawnya Panizzi
Chris Fleisher
Andrew Witchey, brewer and owner of Dancing Gnome Brewery in Sharpsburg, makes unapologetically 'turbid' beers.

Sharpsburg’s Dancing Gnome Beer needs your vote.

The hop-heavy hangout is a reader’s choice contender for USA Today’s 10 best new breweries and last week sat atop the leaderboard ahead of Barrel Theory Beer Company in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Outer Range Brewing Co. in Frisco, Colorado.

Others rounding out the Top 10 include breweries in Tennessee, Michigan, Illinois, Connecticut and North Carolina.

Voting at ends at noon March 19. The winner will be announced March 23.

Competitors include breweries that opened in the past two years.

At Dancing Gnome along Main Street, hops take center stage. Most selections on the rotating tap list are IPAs or double IPAs, according to owner Andrew Witchey.

A native of Lower Burrell, Witchey has a background in film and photography.

He earned a cinema degree at Emerson College in Boston, then got a corporate job shooting marketing videos.

That was before developing a passion for home brewing and opening a thriving Sharpsburg hot spot in October 2016.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, [email protected] or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.