UPMC St. Margaret dermatologist named ‘Everyday Hero’ |
Fox Chapel

UPMC St. Margaret dermatologist named ‘Everyday Hero’

Tawnya Panizzi
Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, M.D. and Dr. Lawrence R. John, UPMC primary care physician and vice-president of the Pa Medical Society.

UPMC St. Margaret dermatologist Melissa Pugliano-Mauro has earned the “Everyday Hero” award from the PA Medical Society for going above and beyond in providing patient care.

She is the first recipient from Pittsburgh to ever win the award and was selected from a statewide pool of nominations.

The honor is given monthly to a medical professional nominated by colleagues, staff or patients.

Pugliano-Mauro is the clinic director of UPMC St. Margaret Dermatology, as well as the program director for the Department of Dermatology Residency Program at the University of Pittsburgh.

She was nominated by colleague Geoffrey Lim, who described her as selfless. Lim cited Pugliano-Mauro’s diligence in coordinating lectures, fundraisers and fellowships. He applauded Pugliano-Mauro for her effort in developing the UPMC Center for Solid Organ Transplant Related Skin Disease, a clinic that specializes in treating patients who will have or have already had an organ transplant. Organ transplant patients are 65 percent more likely to develop life-threatening squamous-cell skin cancer.

Pugliano-Mauro specializes in Mohs surgery, which is used to treat common types of skin cancer.

She completed her undergraduate degree in biology at Washington & Jefferson College before earning her medical degree from Drexel University College of Medicine.

Pugliano-Mauro was presented her award during a brief ceremony on May 23 at her Harmar office, prior to a skin cancer clinic offered by her team during which they performed 110 screenings.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, [email protected] or @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.