ShareThis Page
Fox Chapel releases staggering clean-up costs from summer flooding |
Fox Chapel

Fox Chapel releases staggering clean-up costs from summer flooding

Flood waters surround a gazebo at Fox Chapel Golf Club after Squaw Run flooded on July 2, 2018.

Fox Chapel officials this week released costs associated with July 2 flooding that washed away part of the Squaw Run trail and deposited piles of debris at McCahill Park.

Manager Gary Koehler said more than $400,000 was spent this summer on disaster cleanup.

“The borough experienced severe damage to roads and parks caused by flooding and landslides,” Koehler said.

The three-day rain event caused significant flooding along Squaw Run Road, leading to twisted guide rails, portions of trail washed away and several inches of rocks and mud landing at McCahill Park.

Hunt Road was blocked by downed trees and at least five fallen phone poles, which were removed by the public works crew. Members of the department also back-filled road and bridge edges throughout the borough to make them safe for travel.

Koehler said a landslide below Old Mill Road has yet to be repaired.

“The borough would like to commend the public works department on a phenomenal job, diligently working night and day to clear roads of debris and trees, repairing drainage systems that were washed away and reopening roads as quickly as possible,” Koehler said. “It took several weeks for them to get a handle on repairing all the damage from the storms while also needing to get roadways prepped for paving.”

Koehler said the summer road improvement program was delayed but Youngblood Paving has begun milling roads and work is expected to continue through October, weather permitting, to complete the project.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, [email protected] or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.