ShareThis Page
Women’s Board selects Hosanna House as luncheon beneficiary |
Fox Chapel

Women’s Board selects Hosanna House as luncheon beneficiary

Leon Haynes, Hosanna House executive director, with Julianne Fallert, president of the Women’s Board of Pittsburgh, Linda Thier, Hosanna House board member and Gloria Nelson, Hosanna House director of development.

The Women’s Board of Pittsburgh announced this week that the beneficiary of its annual luncheon fundraiser will be Hosanna House, the Wilkinsburg-based group whose mission is to help empower youth.

Money raised at the luncheon will support Hosanna House in its focus to increase standardized test scores through exposure to STEM programs, Women’s Board member Laura Dawson said.

Specifically, the money will support instruction in their makerspace classroom, aviation lab and outdoor learning space.

Hosanna House provides services to more than 40,000 people a year through meals, summer camps and fitness classes.

Themed “Bridging Communities through Hope,” the luncheon will be Jan. 25 at the Fox Chapel Golf Club. Doors open at 10 a.m. and tickets cost $75.

The Women’s Board is in its 28th year of hosting the event, with the proceeds always funneled to a group that supports women and children’s issues.

This year’s lunch will feature a cooking demonstration by John Berquist from Out of the Fire Cafe, as well as an informal fashion show from Oakmont’s Carabella. There will be silent auctions and a grand raffle.

Dawson said the group has donated more than $740,000 over the years. Past recipients have included Sharpsburg Community Library and Operation Backpack.

Last year, the event brought in a record-breaking $80,000 for the Fox Chapel-based Pediatric Palliative Care Coalition.

For tickets, visit

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.