ShareThis Page
Millvale adopts ‘complete streets’ resolution |

Millvale adopts ‘complete streets’ resolution


Millvale council unanimously passed a complete streets resolution Aug. 14 to provide “safe and convenient” roads for all users.

James Machajewski Jr., council president, and Eddie Figas, interim borough manager, wrote in a joint email that the resolution allows council to expedite projects related to improving mobility safety.

“The borough will use the resolution as a blueprint for establishing more detailed guidelines and ordinances that could address future infrastructure development,” the email states.

Updated infrastructure should consider people of “all ages and abilities,” including “pedestrians, bicyclists, public transit users, persons with accessibility needs, as well as motorists and freight drivers.”

Complete streets policies will apply during the “planning, design and operation of future municipal streets, sidewalks, trails, pedestrian and bicycle pathways, and other transportation projects.”

The resolution suggests that complete streets upgrades include the following: sidewalks, street and sidewalk lighting, pedestrian signals and crosswalks, improved pedestrian access to bus shelters, improvements providing Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility, bicycle parking, shared-use lanes, wide travel lanes or bike lanes, as appropriate, and, finally, drainage and storm water facilities.

Road projects will incorporate complete streets principles, unless the following criteria exist: the cost would be “excessively disproportionate” to the need or probable long-term future use; there is no current or future need; the project “is comprised of ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable conditions,” such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair and surface treatments; and use by non-motorized users is illegal.

According to the resolution, improving mobility through alternative forms of transportation can improve air quality and limit negative environmental impacts from traffic.

Katt Schuler, Millvale Borough Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee chairwoman, said that Jesebel Rivera-Guerra, American Heart Association community health director, contacted her organization two years ago regarding the health benefits of increasing mobility through complete streets planning.

Zaheen Hussain, New Sun Rising sustainability director and Millvale sustainability coordinator, said that the committee had started educating itself on complete streets, as improved mobility is a component of the Millvale EcoDistrict Pivot Plan – a multi-year plan also emphasizing food, water, air quality, energy and equity initiatives.

Hussain said that Eric Boerer, Bike Pittsburgh advocacy director, connected the committee to resources to foster its members’ understanding of complete streets.

Machajewski and Figas mentioned that Councilman Brian Wolovich has proven “instrumental” as he has served as a liason between council and the committee.

“Having educated itself on the benefits of complete streets policies, the bike-ped committee is poised to be in a position of assistance for council as future transportation planning opportunities rise up,” Hussain said.

Schuler said continued education is a priority moving forward.

“Staying in step with a complete streets resolution is a dynamic process,” she said. “With each opportunity for infrastructure repair is an opportunity to re-evaluate the situation. It’s with the most up-to-date information that we’ll be able to advance our throughways for all of its users.”

In 2014, Millvale agreed to improve bike and pedestrian infrastructure as part of its Multi-Municipal Joint Comprehensive Plan, in collaboration with Etna and Sharpsburg. The resolution also states that complete streets embodies the philosophy of the Live Well Allegheny program — of which Millvale is a part — because better mobility may result in improved health and well-being of residents and employees.

Erica Cebzanov is a Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.