Accountant pleads guilt to conspiracy to divert Pa Cyber school funds |
Local News

Accountant pleads guilt to conspiracy to divert Pa Cyber school funds

Dave Conti | Tribune-Review
Neal Prence, an accountant from Koppel, Beaver County, pleaded guilty Wednesday to conspiracy in diversion of about $800,000 in Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School funds for its founder and CEO, Nick Trombetta.

The accountant for former Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School CEO Nick Trombetta admitted Wednesday in federal court that he helped Trombetta illegally divert about $8 million in public money from the Beaver County school.

Neal Prence, 61, of Koppel pleaded guilty to a charge of tax conspiracy. U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti scheduled his sentencing for Jan. 6.

Prence had been set to plead Sept. 19 but backed out at the last minute because of some legal technicalities connected with his plea agreement, said his lawyer, Stanton Levenson.

“It wasn't so much a change of mind as trying to get a couple of details worked out,” Levenson said. He declined comment on those details.

Trombetta pleaded guilty Aug. 24 to illegally diverting about $8 million in public money from the Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School in Midland to several other businesses he created or controlled. He faces up to five years in prison at his scheduled sentencing Dec. 20.

The investigation became public in July 2012 when agents searched Trombetta's office at the school. He resigned his post a month earlier.

Trombetta's sister, Elaine Trombetta Neil, pleaded guilty in October 2013 to filing a false individual income tax return on her brother's behalf. She is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 9.

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-325-4301 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.