Kane wins attorney general race |
Local News

Kane wins attorney general race

HARRISBURG – A former prosecutor backed by Bill Clinton defeated her opponent in the Democratic nomination for state attorney general on Tuesday, based on preliminary results.

With 88 percent of precincts reporting, former Lackawanna Deputy District Attorney Kathleen Kane had 54 percent of the vote to former U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy’s 46 percent. Kane said Murphy conceded the race in a telephone call late Tuesday. “We really worked for it and the people of Pennsylvania spoke,” Kane said. In a second statewide race, Rep. John Maher of Upper St. Clair defeated Frank Pinto, a former college professor and ex-Senate aide, of Dauphin County, for the GOP nomination for auditor general. Murphy, 38, of Bucks County and Kane, 45, campaigned aggressively for the office. Kane seized on Murphy’s admission that he never tried a case in a Pennsylvania courtroom. Murphy said he had legal experience including arguing before the top court of Iraq in Baghdad and teaching law at West Point. Kane was buoyed by former President Bill Clinton’s endorsement which she used in TV ads. Murphy criticized Kane for a $500 campaign donation to Gov. Tom Corbett when he was running as a Republican for attorney general in 2008. The attorney general’s contest “is the premier race on the Democratic side,” said Christopher Borick, a political science professor at Muhlenberg College in Allentown. Cumberland County District Attorney David Freed, 41, of Camp Hill, the Republican-endorsed candidate was unopposed. The Freed-Kane match up “creates an interesting prospect for the fall: prosecutor versus prosecutor,” said Anthony May, a former topaide to the late Democratic Gov. Robert Casey. Democrats too often over the years have not nominated a “tough on crime” prosecutor for the office Republicans have controlled since an elected statewide attorney general was established in 1981. “We’re looking forward to a spirited and tough campaign in the fall,’ Kane said. In the auditor general race, Maher, 53, stressed his experience as a certified public accountant. Pinto, 67, stressed his independence and varied background, which also included heading a banker’s association. With 84 percent of precincts reporting, Maher led Pinto by 66 to 33 percent for the GOP nomination. Maher was the endorsed Republican Party candidate. “Pennsylvania deserves an auditor for auditor general,” Maher said. “The public is ready for public officials who know how to count. The voters…have confirmed that’s important.” On the Democratic side, Rep. Eugene DePasquale, 41, of York was unopposed in the primary. DePasquale went to Central Catholic and is the grandson of former Pittsburgh Council President “Jeep” DePasquale. Maher and DePasquale also won uncontested primaries for their legislative seats, which they would have to give up to take statewide office.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.