Pittsburgh Mills mall in Frazer sells for $100 |
Local News

Pittsburgh Mills mall in Frazer sells for $100

Brian C. Rittmeyer
Eric Felack | Tribune-Review
The Pittsburgh Mills mall sold for $100 at auction.

While his wife was across the hall shopping for shoes, Leo Battung of Harmar sat in on the sale of the Pittsburgh Mills mall Wednesday morning.

“I'm curious to see what happens,” he said. “We're up at the mall a lot.”

While his wife spent about $50 on shoes, the sprawling retail complex in Frazer sold for not much more — just $100.

Attorney Nicholas Godfrey made the opening and only bid at a foreclosure auction held in the space formerly occupied by ITT Tech, which closed in September.

He was representing mortgage holder Wells Fargo, which foreclosed on the 1.1 million-square-foot shopping center in November 2015.

As of October 2015, developers Mills Corp. and Zamias Services owed the bank $143 million, with continuing interest and costs.

The sale consisted of the Galleria enclosed mall and several surrounding lots — not the stores in the nearby shopping complex formally known as the Village at Pittsburgh Mills. Those properties include strip shopping centers and several stand-alone stores, among them Lowe's and Michael's, and restaurants.

Simply a legal move

The transaction was a “consensual foreclosure,” so there would not have been any other bidders, said Sean Barrie, a research analyst with New York City-based Trepp LLC, which provides market research for the real estate and banking industries.

Wells Fargo is the trustee of a Morgan Stanley trust, which holds the mortgage on the mall. The trust will become the owner when the process is completed.

As trustee, Wells Fargo administers the trust. Wells Fargo shows up in legal records as owner because of its role as trustee, Wells Fargo spokesman James Baum said.

A federal court in January 2016 named Jones Lang LaSalle as receiver to operate and manage the property, replacing Zamias Services of Johnstown.

No change in operations expected

Mall General Manager Anthony Stephens, working for Jones lang LaSalle, said they expect no changes in the management or operations of the mall.

“We expect the day-to-day to continue,” Stephens said. “The mall is open and ready for business.”

Frazer Supervisor Lori Ziencik attended the auction with other township officials. The township's offices and police station are housed within the mall; the police department was recently renovated and expanded.

“I really believe it's going to be business as usual,” she said. “The township will continue our relationship with mall personnel.”

The decade-old mall's value has been plummeting — from $190 million a decade ago to an appraisal of $11 million in August — and nearly half of its storefronts are empty. Key tenants have been lost over the years, including a Sears Grand.

Ziencik said many of the mall's hits have come not from the property itself but from larger corporate shutterings and bankruptcy filings. Going forward, she expects to see the mall repopulated with tenants that are not traditional retail.

“They've got to adjust to the retail climate,” she said.

While saying the mall is not all there is to Frazer, Ziencik said it is important to the township and the broader area.

“It's a huge, extreme convenience. It's a definite asset to the Allegheny Valley,” she said. “There's been a lot of jobs created here, not just for our residents.”

Battung's wife, Gail Battung, said she's hopeful the mall turns around and more high-end stores move in.

“There's so many empty stores,” she said. “It's sad.”

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701 or at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.