Yinzers celebrate: Pittsburgh term ‘jagoff’ added to dictionary |
Local News

Yinzers celebrate: Pittsburgh term ‘jagoff’ added to dictionary

Megan Guza
Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
Marcia Feinberg models a few of the 'Pittsburghese' items, including the jag-off glasses and a puzzle featuring well-known 'Yinzer' words and phrases, Friday, December 20, 2013. Marcia is the president of the Mike Feinberg Company store in the Strip District.

Well it took yinz long enough, you Oxford English Dictionary jagoffs.

Uttered for years with affection, in surprise, and at that jerk in the red Camry who cut you off on the Parkway East, the term long loved by Pittsburghers is finally finding an international audience.

The Oxford English Dictionary included “jagoff” on its September list of new words to be added to the more than 600,000 already in its pages.

Pittsburghers were pleased, n'at.

“It used to be my favorite word,” said Mary McGregor of Hays. “I use it all the time.”

“Jagoff, noun: (chiefly in Western Pennsylvania) a stupid, irritating, or contemptible person,” the online entry reads.

Brandon Myers, 37, said the word is so ingrained in Pittsburgh culture that it should be recognized.

“It's the nature of Pittsburgh,” he said. “It's part of life. It's part of being a Pittsburgher.”

Myers of Whitehall said that as he's gotten older, he's tried to incorporate more “Pittsburghese” into his lexicon. He said the word's multiple uses have given it staying power.

“That's the beauty of it — you can love someone or you can hate someone, and you can use the same word,” he said.

A brief but headstrong movement started in late 2014, headed by the folks at, aimed at persuading the powers that be at Merriam-Webster to add the colloquialism to the pre-eminent dictionary's pages.

The petition garnered 1,734 signatures and acted as a fundraiser for the Pittsburgh Emergency Medicine Foundation.

John Chamberlin, creator, said Webster's response was that the word needed to be more widely used in the English language than it was at the time.

Enter Mark Cuban.

“This is anecdotal, but I have to think Mark Cuban using it in stumping for Hillary (Clinton) — it went viral at that point,” Chamberlin said.

Indeed, at a July Clinton campaign stop in Pittsburgh, the Dallas Mavericks owner referred to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump as a jagoff, asking, “Is there any bigger jagoff in the world than Donald Trump?”

“Jagoff” remains omitted by Merriam-Webster.

“(Webster) is adding words like ‘emoji' and all these crazy things. Come on, they're not even real words,” Chamberlin said. “Jagoff is a real word.”

And a fun word, he said.

“It's a part of the dialect, it's a fun phrase — ‘ya jagoff,' ” he said. “You hear it, and you know someone has a Pittsburgh association.”

And now, said Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto, it finally has a true, inarguable definition.

Peduto threw his full support behind Chamberlin's 2014 movement, recording a public service announcement urging Pittsburghers to sign the petition. On Friday, he praised Oxford's decision to include the versatile term.

“It's taken from the jagger bush and somebody who's jagged — the jagoff is somebody who's that irritable person,” he said. “It has been confirmed; there is no longer any other debate. Now the world understands the true definition.”

Other September additions to the Oxford English Dictionary include clickbait, scrumdiddlyumptious, 'Merica and Yoda-like.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.