McCandless council appoints residents to fill 13 vacancies on advisory boards and commissions |
North Hills

McCandless council appoints residents to fill 13 vacancies on advisory boards and commissions

Tony LaRussa

The following people were appointed by McCandless council on Dec. 17 to serve on various advisory boards and commissions. The list includes the name of the appointee, the position and the year in which their term expires. Terms run through December unless noted.

• Amy Wehrspann, Personnel Board, 2021

• Mark Sullivan, McCandless Industrial Development Authority, 2023

• Russell Lucas, Zoning Hearing Board, 2021

• Thomas Edwards, Zoning Hearing Board, 2020

• Michael McGraw, first alternate to the Zoning Hearing Board, 2021

• James Bann, second alternate to the Zoning Hearing Board, 2021

• Lamar Williams, Planning Commission, 2022

• Daniel Kortum, Planning Commission, 2022

• Jason Moots, Planning Commission, 2019

• David Vetere, Uniform Construction Code, International Fire Code and Property Maintenance Appeals Board, 2022

• Dr. Arvind Venkat, McCandless-Franklin Park Ambulance Authority, 2023

• Patrick Semon, McCandless Township Sanitary Authority, 2023

• Angela Woods, Environmental Advisory Committee, August 2020

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or [email protected] or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.