ShareThis Page
Monroeville voters say ‘yes’ to five home rule charter amendments |

Monroeville voters say ‘yes’ to five home rule charter amendments

Sign outside Monroeville municipal building.

Monroeville voters approved five ballot questions during last week’s primary election.

Residents were asked whether they want to make changes to the municipality’s home rule charter that range in significance from reducing the size of an advisory board to publishing ordinances when they are proposed rather than after they are adopted.

The question that received the most “no” votes was question four. It amended a rule requiring the municipality to advertise in a newspaper when boards had vacancies and reduced the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board from 11 members to eight.

To see each of the amendments to the charter, including an explanation of what will happen now that they are approved, go online to

The home rule charter gives Monroeville the ability to set up its government structure and outlines its authority and its limitations. Municipalities that choose home rule can do anything that’s not specifically denied by the state constitution, the General Assembly, or the charter itself.

Monroeville’s home-rule charter became effective in 1976 and its major revision was in 1996.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.