ShareThis Page
Fact-finder assigned to Gateway to help resolve gridlocked teachers contract |

Fact-finder assigned to Gateway to help resolve gridlocked teachers contract

Gateway High School

The state Labor Relations Board appointed a fact-finder recently to help advance sputtered contract talks between the Gateway teachers union and the school district.

Fact-finder Michelle Miller-Kotula was appointed by the board at a meeting in Harrisburg July 17, according to union president and Gateway teacher Mark Spinola.

Spinola said the process takes 40 days, at which point Miller-Kotula will issue a report.

“Parties then have 10 days to accept or reject the report,” Spinola said.

The union and school district are permitted to continue contract talks during the fact-finding process, but no meetings have been scheduled, said Mary Beth Cirucci, school board vice president and negotiations committee chair.

Negotiations for a new contract began in January 2017 and the union has been working without a contract since its pact expired last August. The union voted to authorize a strike in March if negotiations continue to stall.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.