ShareThis Page
Monroeville begins process of collecting stormwater management fee |

Monroeville begins process of collecting stormwater management fee


Monroeville started the process of implementing a Municipal Storm Sewer System, or MS4, fee for its residents and commercial properties during an agenda setting meeting Aug. 9.

The fee, assessed separately to residential and commercial properties, will fund improvements for Monroeville’s aging $36 million stormwater infrastructure.

Manager Tim Little said the municipality will determine a fee schedule by calculating “equivalent residential units,” or ERUs, the same calculation used by Mt. Lebanon, which implemented an MS4 fee in 2011. Residents there pay anywhere from $8 to $24 a month.

“There’s no tax – it’s a fee,” said Councilman Ron Harvey, who chairs a committee that has explored the issue since January. “(The fee) varies for commercial businesses because it depends on their square footage of impervious surface.”

Harvey said 50 to 100 residential properties were taken into consideration when determining the amount of the monthly fee.

“All (residential) properties are to be charged the same,” Harvey said.

“Nobody likes paying additional fees but in the long run, when it fixes what we said it would, it’ll be worth it,” Harvey said. The councilman has said Monroeville’s stormwater infrastructure is “severely deteriorating.”

Council will vote on advertising an MS4 ordinance, a step needed in order to implement a fee, on Aug. 14. It will also appoint a designated engineer to oversee the MS4 program and a billing entity.

Pat Fulkerson, Monroeville’s tax collector, said during an Aug. 8 meeting the municipality should consider making the billing agency the municipality’s tax office instead of outsourcing the service.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.