ShareThis Page
Monroeville man’s death in Allegheny River ruled accidental drowning |

Monroeville man’s death in Allegheny River ruled accidental drowning


A fishing accident that led to the death of a Monroeville man on Aug. 25 has been ruled an accident.

The cause of death was ruled as a drowning, according to a Medical Examiner report issued Aug. 30.

Gregory Rudcki, 51, went fishing with a friend and a dog on the Alle­gheny River near Plum and Springdale on Aug. 25. The men launched the boat from Springdale at 8 a.m., said Plum police Lt. Lanny Conley in a news release.

Several area police, fire, paramedics and river rescue units then responded to the Plum and Springdale shorelines to investigate a report of a person submerged in the water around 10:30 a.m.

Rudcki’s body was found just before 2 p.m. around 15 feet from the shore in Plum. The water was nine feet deep, according to Darrick Gerano, administrative director of the Murrysville Medic One Dive Team.

Conley said in a news release the men decided to cross the river to the Plum side, off of Barking Road, where the dog could swim in shallow water.

Conley wrote that Rudcki “apparently entered the water voluntarily and began to struggle staying afloat.” The boat owner, whose identity has not been released, provided the man with a flotation device but Rudcki, who tried to swim to shore, went under water and didn’t resurface. The boat owner then called 911.

The medical examiner’s report listed the investigating agency as Plum police but Jeff Armstrong, Plum Police chief, said his department is not investigating and referred questions to the state Fish and Boat Commission.

A spokesperson for the commission declined to comment because it is still an open investigation.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.