ShareThis Page
Monroeville establishes ‘MS4’ fee |

Monroeville establishes ‘MS4’ fee

Monroeville’s municipal building.Monroeville’s municipal building.

Monroeville approved an ordinance Oct. 9, allowing it to fee residents, property owners and places of worship yearly to fund its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, or MS4.

The fund is expected to raise $3.2 million a year and be used for various sediment and flood control projects throughout the municipality.

Fees were determined by calculating a property’s “equivalent residential units,” or ERUs. One ERU is equivalent to 2,385 square feet.

Residents will be charged $120 a year.

Owners of larger properties were assessed individually to calculate how many ERUs are present. Some of those include the Monroeville Mall, which will be charged $222,840 a year, and Gateway School District at $91,920.

Places of worship have been given a 25 percent discount to the yearly fee, which was an added provision to the original ordinance. The provision comes after a Monroeville pastor said the fees are unfair to religious institutions.

In order to qualify for the discount, religious institutions must be used “only for the conduct of religious services and/or religious education,” according to the ordinance.

During the program’s first year, all property owners will be given a 2 percent discount if paid by March 31, 2019, according to the ordinance. Starting January 2020, a 10 percent late fee is charged if fees are not paid by June 30.

The Turtle Creek Valley Council of Government will do the MS4 billing.

The proposed ordinance also creates an appeal process for individuals who disagree with how a property was assessed. Council’s next step is to appoint a three-person appeals board.

The updated ordinance slashed an entire section that set up a monthly 1 percent late fee and a 1 percent interest rate for each month it isn’t paid.

The fee calculations were based on an MS Consultants report that found Monroeville’s five-year Pollution Reduction Plan will cost $37.7 million, or $7.5 million per year. The PRP is only one part of the multifaceted MS4 program, which includes reducing the municipality’s 801,302 pounds of sediment per year at $47 per pound by using bioswales, retention ponds, permeable pavement, street sweeping, stream restoration and forested buffers.

To read the ordinance, visit

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.