ShareThis Page
Delayed Monroeville Library elevator project to be complete ‘sooner rather than later’ |

Delayed Monroeville Library elevator project to be complete ‘sooner rather than later’

Dillon Carr
| Friday, December 28, 2018 11:30 a.m

When construction began on the Monroeville Library’s long-awaited elevator in June, the director was hopeful it would be completed by September.

When that time came and went, the new deadline became Dec. 1, when the library hosted a private party to show appreciation for its many donors who helped make the project a reality.

“We would have liked it to have been a grand opening (party),” Library Director Nicole Henline said.

As the project still is under way, the event became a “thank-you” to the library’s donors who collectively raised about $60,000 in 2016. The library itself set aside $40,000 for the project, and the rest came from a $100,000 state grant in March.

Henline said the delay was due to unpredictable weather, an unforeseenconcrete foundation found during excavation and demolition of the pre-existing lift.

The crew, from Masco Construction, had to lay concrete in sections instead of all at once, Henline said. She said the change of plans did not affect the $200,000 budget.

“They’re moving forward. They’ve been here almost every day since the beginning of December. The elevator is on site. It will be sooner rather than later,” she said.

The library’s hours have not changed during construction.

“They’ve been very considerate of the fact we’re still running a library. And they’ve kept it as clean as possible and blocked off the work area so dust doesn’t get in the main part of the library,” Henline said. “It has made the children’s room noisy at times, but it’s been fairly easy going.”

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.