Gateway decides against buying a $300,000 scoreboard, for now |

Gateway decides against buying a $300,000 scoreboard, for now

Graduation Ceremonies 2016. Gateway High School scoreboard at Antimarino Stadium. Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune Review

Gateway school board recently backtracked on a decision it made in April that would have allowed the district to buy a $300,000 scoreboard for the high school stadium.

Instead, officials opted to repair the old one and wait for sponsors to volunteer to fund its replacement.

In April, school directors Rick McIntyre and Jack Bova felt the price for the proposed scoreboard — the same model used by college and professional teams across the country — was too high.

Director of Facilities Robert Brown said the 16-year-old scoreboard was in “decay” and cost of the new board would, over time, be recouped because it features a screen capable of displaying videos and space for advertisers.

McIntyre and Bova dissented in a 7-2 vote to purchase the scoreboard at the April meeting.

The decision to purchase drew ire from Monroeville residents on social media. Some suggested the vote indicated officials showed favoritism to high school sports, while others criticized the purchase as being frivolous at a time when the board was considering passing a budget with a $1.9 million shortfall and a proposed tax hike. That budget passed June 27. (See story on Page 1.)

Board members repeated many of the sentiments expressed by concerned citizens when revisiting the scoreboard topic.

“I certainly would never support this scoreboard without knowing who the entity is, what the arrangement is, when they plan on providing the funds — so if we’re not anywhere near that point then let’s get this scoreboard fixed. Let’s live with the shame of an old-fashioned scoreboard,” Bova said.

School Director George Lapcevich, who was originally part of the majority vote to make the $300,000 purchase, wanted to proceed with purchasing a new scoreboard.

“What’s a 7-2 vote, if that’s the board’s decision at the time — how can we back down from the vote right now?” Lapcevich said.

Bruce Dice, the district’s solicitor, said if a contract has not been entered into, the board can delay the purchase.

The board voted 7-2 to delay the purchase of a new scoreboard despite Lapcevich’s protest. School directors Val Warning and Lapcevich dissented.

Superintendent Bill Short said administration has sought sponsorship from area businesses and companies.

Short did not respond to a request for comment.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.