Gateway High School student arrested after Snapchat ‘threat’ discovered |

Gateway High School student arrested after Snapchat ‘threat’ discovered

Dillon Carr
Gateway High School
A Monroeville police SUV

A Gateway High School student was arrested Friday morning by Monroeville police minutes into first class after administrators learned of a “terroristic threat” made via social media that referenced the recent mass shooting in Florida.

The threat was made on Snapchat, a popular image-sharing app, Thursday night. District officials were not aware of the threat until about 30 minutes before school started Friday morning.

Tim Skoog, assistant director for the district's police force, said students and high school staff alerted administration about the threat.

“We read the threat, on Snapchat, and we went in and grabbed him,” Skoog said. “Then the police were called.”

Monroeville Police Chief Doug Cole did not immediately return phone calls requesting comment.

Skoog declined to provide details about the threat, but said the message was a paragraph that referenced a shooting at a Florida high school that left 17 dead this week.

In a letter posed on the district's website, Superintendent Bill Short said the student was removed from the building after “discovering a terroristic threat.”

Short did not return a phone call seeking comment. A district secretary said the school remained open after the incident. Skoog said the school was not put into lockdown at any point.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer, reach him at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.