ShareThis Page
Gateway schools getting metal detectors |

Gateway schools getting metal detectors

Gateway High School

Metal detectors are coming to Gateway School District.

The district’s Board of Directors voted to place a new policy on 30-day public display Nov. 20. The policy includes details about how the district will use metal detectors and handheld wand detectors.

Board member Rick McIntyre said the district is planning to purchase metal detectors for every building.

“It’s becoming a way of life. You go into anywhere – any event – and you’re going through a metal detector. It’s important to do anything we can to keep the buildings safe,” McIntyre said.

To start, the district will purchase six metal detectors for the high school and four units for Gateway Middle School through the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency grant program.

The funds totalling $25,000 will be available in December. The district will purchase the 10 units in January to roll out the program through the end of the year, said Assistant Superintendent Dennis Chakey.

According to the policy, which is available to read at the district’s administrative building, everyone who enters a Gateway building will be subject to a metal detector test.

“No student, staff member or visitor should be subject to the dangers inherent in a firearm, knife or other potentially dangerous object carried onto district property by another person,” reads the policy.

But that doesn’t mean everyone will be screened every time, said Mary Beth Circucci, the school board’s safety committee chair and school board vice president.

“We don’t have the manpower or time to run every kid through,” she said. “But it will still be a deterrent because the kids won’t know if they’re going to go through it. This is a way to have metal detection without taking two hours to do it.”

Instead of herding every student, staff member and visitor through the metal detectors, Cirucci said the district’s 13 school police officers will randomize who gets screened – at least for now.

“We’re doing this as a trial. There will be trial and error as far as what works best for our district,” Cirucci said, adding the district will build on the program after the trial period.

“There are a variety of ways you can randomly choose kids to go through them,” Cirucci said.

Options include screening students from specific buses on certain days, screening students at different school entrances, or screening every fifth student who walks through the doors.

The new policy states, “random screenings must ensure that no discrimination enters into the selection of the individuals to be screened.”

Nearby districts such as Penn Hills and Pittsburgh Public Schools have had metal detectors in place for years.

“Most of our schools are moving toward them,” said Ebony Pugh, a PPS public information officer. “There’s just a few elementary schools that don’t have them.”

At Penn Hills School District, metal detectors have become part of students’ and staff members’ daily routines, said Superintendent Nancy Hines.

“Students in grades five and up must pass through metal detection stations each morning, and bags are also manually searched,” Hines said in an email.

For younger students, she said bags are now checked within the classroom prior to the start of formal instruction. The procedure was introduced this school year to intercept toys and other “non-instructional devices.”

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.