Archive

ShareThis Page
Hearing postponed for Monroeville firefighter accused of impersonating policeman | TribLIVE.com
Monroeville

Hearing postponed for Monroeville firefighter accused of impersonating policeman

Tribune-Review
| Monday, December 12, 2016 3:57 p.m.

The preliminary hearing for a suspended Monroeville deputy fire chief accused of impersonating a police officer and official oppression was postponed Monday at the request of his defense attorney.

Attorney Owen Seman said his client, George Gerstacker, 46, of Monroeville will get a mental health evaluation before returning to District Jeffrey L. Herbst’s court on March 20 for the hearing.

The Monroeville attorney said neither he nor Gerstacker would comment further on the case.

Monroeville police filed the misdemeanor charges against Gerstacker on Sept. 16, three days after he allegedly pulled a motorcyclist over for erratic driving on William Penn Highway, took the driver’s information and told him to expect “a citation in the mail.”

The motorcyclist called police to tell them he had been pulled over by someone he wasn’t sure was an officer and gave them the license number of Gerstacker’s vehicle, according to the criminal complaint. The motorcyclist in a written statement told police Gerstacker used flashing red and blue emergency vehicle lights but no siren to signal him to stop.

Monroeville Station 5 fire Chief Ron Harvey said in September that firefighters are allowed to use the emergency lights to assist them in getting to calls, and that Gerstacker abused that privilege. Gerstacker was suspended pending an internal investigation of the incident, he said. The chief did not return calls on Monday.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367 or mdivittorio@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.