Monroeville council delays vote on MS4 ordinance |

Monroeville council delays vote on MS4 ordinance

Dillon Carr
Monroeville Municipal Center

Monroeville council voted unanimously at its September meeting to delay a vote on an ordinance that would establish a yearly fee for residents and business owners to fund repairs of its stormwater infrastructure.

The motion to table the ordinance came after lengthy and heated discussions about the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System, or MS4, fee.

“The committee has proposed some changes to the ordinance that will ultimately benefit the residents and businesses alike,” said Councilman Ron Harvey, who also chairs a committee that has researched the issue since January.

Harvey did not specify what changes were proposed by the committee, which is made up of Harvey and Councilwoman Linda Gaydos, along with municipal manager Tim Little, Municipal Solicitor Bob Wratcher, Engineering Director Paul Hugus and Staff Engineer Jamie Storey.

The yearly fee would range from $120 for residents up to $223,000 for the Monroeville Mall. Nonprofit organizations and churches also would be assessed the fee.

The fee is based on a property’s “equivalent residential units,” or ERUs. One ERU is equivalent to 2,385 square feet. For more on the specifics of the proposed ordinance, visit

As it stands, the fee schedule would collect just over $3 million a year, which would then be channeled into the municipality’s Pollution Control and Flood Reduction Special Revenue Fund, Harvey said.

Residents and clergymen have expressed concern over the amount of the fee, arguing that it would put a strain on tight budgets. They also have said they are worried about what the municipality will do with the collected funds, claiming council has been vague in describing what projects could be planned.

At the meeting, Harvey offered a list of capital projects that would eventually occur, along with an estimated cost for each:

• Logans Ferry Road for $200,000.

• Lower Old Ramsey Road for $450,000

• Willow Edge Plan for $170,000

• Lower Rosecrest for $100,000

• Mosside Boulevard near Compunetix for $200,000

• Brookside Drive for $350,000

• Glendale Court for $200,000

• 1249 Harvest Drive for $20,000 and 1261 Harvest Drive for $20,000

• 300 Garden City Drive for $350,000

• Old William Penn Highway intersection at Beatty Road for $350,000

Harvey said the list is just some of the projects council has considered.

“We worked a long time and very hard to make sure the ERU was fair and allows us to fulfill our obligations to our permit and correct longtime needed repairs and updates to our stormwater management around our municipality,” he said.

Monroeville’s next council meeting is at 7 p.m. Oct. 9 at the municipal building, 2700 Monroeville Blvd.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.