ShareThis Page
Shopping-center owners awaiting DEP approval on sinkhole solution |

Shopping-center owners awaiting DEP approval on sinkhole solution

Mary Pickels
| Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:25 a.m
A massive sinkhole in the Monroeville Hills Shopping Center on William Penn Highway awaits a resolution. Photo by Lillian DeDomenic

Grass is growing in a massive sinkhole at the Monroeville Hills Shopping Center on William Penn Highway, and there’s nothing the municipality can do about it.

Property owners are awaiting approval from the Department of Environmental Protection to move forward with a long-term solution, said Paul Hugus, director of the building and engineering department in Monroeville.

It’s estimated the project will be completed by the end of October, but it could take longer, Hugus said.

“Getting an answer from the DEP on a time limit … it’s not going to happen,” he said.

The pavement gave way in September, due to issues with a nearby water line.

The project has blocked a through way to the shopping center and is forcing drivers to make illegal left turns on to Old William Penn Highway.

Councilwoman Lois Drumheller – who lives near the shopping center – suggested that property owners add lighting nearby “for a better line of sight moving out of that shopping area.”

Robert Glimcher, owner of the Glimcher Group, which owns the property, did not return phone calls.

Residents have asked for a stop sign on Old William Penn Highway, where cars are making illegal turns.

A stop sign would require a traffic study and an ordinance, Hugus said.

Once the work is completed, it would be nearly impossible to remove the stop sign, he said.

“You can’t unring that bell,” Hugus said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.