ShareThis Page
Franklin Regional residents pack meeting seeking answers on Sloan Elementary campus |

Franklin Regional residents pack meeting seeking answers on Sloan Elementary campus

Patrick Varine | Tribune-Rev iew
Franklin Regional Assistant Superintendent Mary Catherine Reljac speaks at a forum held Monday, March 12, 2018, at Franklin Regional Senior High School in Murrysville.
Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review
Donna Wolf, Mary Catherine Reljac, John Koury and Tina Gillen sort questions posed by residents at a Monday, March 12, 2018 public forum at Franklin Regional Senior High School in Murrysville.

Franklin Regional School District residents still had plenty of questions and concerns about the Sloan “elementary campus” project at Monday night’s public forum.

About 280 people packed the high school cafeteria, with emotions running high at times and several audience members expressing dissatisfaction with what they perceived as a lack of answers.

“We came here because we were told we’d have our questions answered,” said Val Mittereder of Murrysville. “That’s why there’s 200-some people here.”

The district is seeking to consolidate its elementary students onto one campus.

In order to do that, Sloan Elementary would be renovated to allow it to accommodate students in kindergarten through second grade.

A new elementary school would be built that would house grades 3 to 5.

The projected cost is about $54 million, and likely more than $100 million when factoring in interest over time.

Similar to the previous town hall meeting in the cafeteria, residents were broken into small groups and paired with school board members and administrators to generate discussion as well as questions.

Those questions, written on Post-It notes, filled four large boards under general categories like “Safety,” Traffic” and “Demographics.”

Among the questions that nearly every group put forth:

•Were sites other than Sloan considered?

• How will traffic concerns be addressed, particularly access for emergency vehicles that will have to traverse Sardis Road to reach the district’s elementary students?

• Concerns about the population growth projected in the district’s demographic study, which predicts an increase in elementary enrollment over the long term.

Board members emphasized that the project was not conceived to fulfill a “wish list” that administrators and teachers had compiled.

“What we’re pushing for on this is functionality, not glitz,” school board member John Koury said. “And the functionality of the classroom spaces is being designed by input from our teachers.”

Board member Gregg Neavin said the district’s current buildings were “simply not constructed to provide a 21st-century education.

“When you look at a South Fayette (School District) classroom, there’s no Tiffany chandeliers,” Neavin said. “There’s a space for kids to work and learn.”

Answers promised

Neavin, who ran much of the meeting and engaged in a few contentious back-and-forth debates, said that while the board wouldn’t be able to answer every single question raised at the meeting, he was committed to getting every question answered in a format that would be posted to the district’s website and mailed to anyone who requests a copy.

Mittereder said she and others were not pleased with the roundtable discussion approach.

“I think we’d really like to have our questions answered, and not ‘play classroom,’” she said.

The forum lasted past deadline for this issue.

The school board’s next public meeting is set for 7:30 p.m. Monday at the Murrysville Municipal Building, 4100 Sardis Road.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected], 724-850-2862 or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.