Team USA withdraws from International Biology Olympiad held in Iran |

Team USA withdraws from International Biology Olympiad held in Iran

Patrick Varine

Bhav Jain of Murrysville was more than happy to attend the USA Biology Olympiad and meet up with some of the nation’s best science students this June in San Diego.

He was even happier to finish with a bronze medal among the top 12. The top four finishers qualified for the 2018 International Science Olympiad as Team USA members.

The venue for the final competition, however — Tehran, Iran — ultimately proved problematic, particularly after President Trump decided that the United States would withdraw from a nuclear deal with the Middle Eastern country.

That led to Team USA’s decision not to attend.

“It was a painfully made decision, after lengthy consideration and conversation at a board of trustees meeting,” said Joann DiGennaro, president at the Center for Excellence in Education, which oversees the USA Biology Olympiad.

DiGennaro said that up until May, “we were planning to have the team go, and that was with the help of U.S. Ambassador Thomas Pickering, who had spoken with the Iranian consulate.”

Jain, a rising senior at Franklin Regional, said he had concerns but was confident the team could have made a safe trip to Iran.

“I thought it would be OK, but I definitely was a little worried overall,” he said. “It’s a region known for a lot of issues.”

The U.S. State Department issued a standing travel advisory for Iran on Jan. 10, noting there is a “very high risk of arbitrary arrest and detention of U.S. citizens” in the country. And despite DiGennaro’s conversations with Pickering, the federal government does not have official diplomatic or consular relations with Iran.

Team USA members were excited coming out of the national competition.

“Nationals was awesome,” Jain said. “I met 19 of the smartest students in the nation, and we learned a lot about animal and molecular biology.”

Team USA students regularly come home with some of the top medals from the international competition.

“We did inquire as to whether they could take the written exam (in the United Staes), but there would’ve been transparency issues, and probably a lot of complaints from other nations,” DiGennaro said.

On May 8, the United States officially withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal , which among other things placed restrictions on Iran’s enrichment of uranium. On May 12, DiGennaro requested a written commitment from the Iranian consulate assuring the safety of Team USA members.

After waiting two weeks with no response, DiGennaro decided to pull out of the international competition.

“I received messages from many parents after we pulled out, that they agreed with the decision,” she said. “We were also getting a lot of questions from Western nations about whether the U.S. was going to participate.”

For Jain and Team USA members, it was simultaneously a relief and a disappointment.

“In the end, it was out of my hands,” he said.

The larger world of international politics put Team USA in a tough position, DiGennaro said.

“It is sad, but I think it was the wise thing to do,” she said of withdrawing from the competition, which took place July 15-22 in Tehran.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

AFP/Getty Images
A picture taken on July 24, 2018 shows a view of Navvab street in the Iranian capital Tehran. / AFP PHOTO / ATTA KENAREATTA KENARE/AFP/Getty Images
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.