ShareThis Page
Voter rolls at 15 percent of Westmoreland precincts exceed state recommendations |

Voter rolls at 15 percent of Westmoreland precincts exceed state recommendations

Pennsylvania’s election law states that a voting precinct should not contain more than 1,200 voters “except for good cause shown.”

Maury Fey of Murrysville doesn’t see any good cause for assigning more than 3,600 voters each to the Sardis and Newlonsburg precincts.

Fey waited about 45 minutes to vote during the midterms in November, “but I was there early. From 10 or 11 a.m. on, that line was all the way from the church hall entrance down to Tarr Hollow Road.”

By 1:30 p.m. on Election Day, the wait to vote at Newlonsburg was nearly two hours.

“When I looked at the data from the various voting precincts, it was obvious that a lot of people in two of our precincts were disenfranchised from voting because of the very long wait times,” Fey said.

Tom Wubben, chairman for the Murrysville Export Republican Committee, agreed.

“The wait times impede those attempting to exercise their right,” Wubben said. “The problem was compounded by a shortage of volunteers needed to assist in the voting process.”

All seven voting precincts in Murrysville exceed 1,200 people. The smallest, East Murrysville precinct, has 1,425 registered voters.

In North Huntingdon, a third of its 24 precincts exceed 1,200 by 200 or more voters.

In Hempfield, nine out of 28 precincts and countywide 44 of 305 precincts contain at least 1,400 registered voters.

Only Unity Township’s Dennison precinct, with 3,485 registered voters, approaches Sardis and Newlonsburg as the most outsized in the county.

Fey said he plans to petition the Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court to direct the elections bureau to investigate the issue. A petition signed by 20 voters from a particular precinct is enough to kick-start the process, according to state law. The elections bureau would then be required to report back to the court the results of its investigation.

“If the county board shall find that a division, redivision, alteration, formation or consolidation of election districts will promote the convenience of the electors and the public interests, it shall recommend a proper division, redivision, alteration, formation or consolidation,” according to state law.

Because precincts must remain within a municipality, the only option is to redistrict Murrysville, said Beth Lechman, the county’s elections director.

Lechman said her office has spoken to people in Murrysville about the issue and is willing to help if the municipality wants to redistrict.

Fey said a lot of voters initially looked at the large turnout for the 2016 election as an anomaly.

“But the fact that the public is now more energized than ever before, and we had the same thing happen in 2018, says to me this is not an anomaly,” he said. “This is a bipartisan problem, and we ought to attack it on that basis.”

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via
Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
A long line of voters wait to cast their ballots, some having stood for nearly an hour, as large crowds turn out to vote at Newlonsburg Presbyterian Church in Murrysville on Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.