New Ross law bars discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity |
North Hills

New Ross law bars discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity

Tony LaRussa

While federal laws prohibit nearly all forms of discrimination, there are some areas where the protections fall short.

On Monday, Ross commissioners plugged holes in the federal law by making it a crime to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.

The ordinance, which was approved by a 5-2 vote, does not single out sexual orientation and gender identity for protections. Rather, it is a sweeping measure that adds to the state and federal anti-discrimination laws that already exist.

Commissioners Rick Avon and Grace Stanko voted to oppose the measure. Commissioners Jeremy Shaffer and Jack Betkowski were absent from the meeting.

During previous public discussions about the ordinance, Commission President Steve Korbel, who crafted the measure, said the law is an effort to establish a legal baseline for how people should be treated and is not being enacted in response to complaints about discrimination.

Korbel said the ordinance also can serve as a welcome message to future residents and businesses.

It is “the civil rights issue of our time,” Korbel said prior to Monday’s vote. “Folks who fall into this category deserve the same protections as anybody else.”

To follow up on discrimination complaints, the new ordinance creates an Equal Opportunity Board consisting of five Ross residents.

The board will have the power to issue a cease-and-desist order and fines of up to $600. The victim also will have the ability to file a lawsuit seeking additional compensation from the perpetrator.

In cases involving housing discrimination, violators could be fined under the federal Fair Housing Act, which calls for a fine of $10,000 for the first offense, $25,000 for a second offense and $50,000 for subsequent offenses.

Avon said while he opposes discrimination, he is concerned about the law’s ramifications.

“Let me be clear about this because it’s a sensitive subject,” he said. “I do not discriminate against anybody. Every person on earth is on equal standing.”

But Avon questioned whether the law could open the municipality to legal action by someone who disagrees with the findings made by the Equal Opportunity Board.

“Is this going to come back on us?” he asked. Avon also balked at creating a board without first determining how much its operation will cost the township.

Korbel said the new board will be guided by a solicitor and that the determinations it makes will be no different than decisions made by other boards and commissions, which can be appealed in court.

Since the law is new, the township will have to estimate how much to budget to cover expenses for the all-volunteer board.

“It depends on how many complaints we get,” he said. ‘We’ll have to make our best guess estimate and see as we go.”

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or [email protected] or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.