Cavalier Land Partners seek conditional use approval in Pine for subdivision |
North Hills

Cavalier Land Partners seek conditional use approval in Pine for subdivision

Karen Price

Cavalier Land Partners is still seeking conditional use approvals for the construction of patio homes and carriage homes at the Laurel Grove subdivision following the Pine Township board of supervisors meeting on Sept. 17.

The supervisors held public hearings on a number of items related to development on the 81-acre site across from Pine-Richland High School. Cavalier Land Partners is proposing to build single family homes, patio homes, carriage homes and single family attached lots.

The planning commission has, at different meetings, recommended that the board grant all the requested approvals. Jonathan Kamin, the attorney representing Cavalier Land Partners, gave a presentation to the board detailing the criteria for granting of the requests and the specified requirements the developers have met.

Members of the Lake Mac­Leod Homeowners Association continue to oppose the plans because they claim sediment and runoff from construction has already damaged the lake their properties surround and continued construction will create a further negative environmental impact on their neighborhood.

Earlier this year, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, in an appeal brought by the homeowners association, reversed a decision by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County stating that the Pine supervisors were right to grant Cavalier Land Partners waivers from certain zoning ordinances in the Laurel Grove development.

The board left the hearing open for 13 days to allow parties from both sides to submit comments.

Pine supervisors also held a public hearing on Madia Homes’ submission of an application to modify the Heights of North Park planned residential zoning development requirement of a front building line setback from 40 feet to 25 feet on a lot on which they plan to build a new luxury home.

Luke Madia told the board the request was based on a PRD that would have originally allowed a 25-foot setback and explained that the lot on which they plan to build is challenging because it tapers off.

The home they designed is significantly smaller than others on the street in order to fit on the lot, he said, but the home would still sit very close to the back hillside.

Supervisor Frank Spagnolo asked if any residents have submitted opposition to the plan and Larry Kurpakus, director of land development and code enforcement, said they had not.

Karen Price is a Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.