Archive

ShareThis Page
Department of Education to give Penn Hills money toward first school police officer | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Department of Education to give Penn Hills money toward first school police officer

The Penn Hills School District will receive $39,900 next school year to help pay for the district’s first school police officer, or SPO.

The district will be one of 114 school districts and municipalities to receive a total of $3.9 million through the Pennsylvania Department of Education, officials said last week.

An SPO differs from a school resource officer in that SPOs are retired police or federal agents that can issue citations for summary offenses on site at the district’s three schools, Assistant Superintendent Nancy Hines said.

Hines said the SPO will rotate throughout the district, but spend most of his or her time at the middle and elementary school because the district has Penn Hills police officers stationed at the high school.

She said any major offenses will be dealt with by the Penn Hills Police Department, and anticipates that the SPO issues citations for smoking, parking violations and other small offenses.

Schools such as Penn Hills that are receiving the grant for the first time will be eligible for a second grant during the 2015-16 school year.

Gateway School District received a first-year grant for $60,000, which district officials plan to use for an SRO.

Light Up Night in Penn Hills

Penn Hills will hold its annual Holiday Light Up on Dec. 4 from 7 to 9 p.m. at the Penn Hills municipal building at 12245 Frankstown Road.

There will be Christmas caroling, pictures with Santa, refreshments and the unveiling of the annual Police Helping People Daily train display.

The event is sponsored by the municipality and the Penn Hills Quality Community Project.

The Penn Hills Rotary Club will sponsor the pictures with Santa.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.