Penn Hills beefs up hazing policy |
Penn Hills

Penn Hills beefs up hazing policy

School officials in Penn Hills approved changes to the district’s hazing policy that will require all school employees to report hazing incidents.

District spokeswoman Teresita Kolenchak said no recent events prompted the action, but district officials are in the process of updating many policies.

The school board approved revised policies in a 7-0 vote at the Oct. 27 meeting. Board members Donald Kuhn and Joseph Bailey were absent.

Changes to the hazing policy specify the reporting and investigation procedures.

The revised policy requires all school employees to report all hazing incidents that they are aware of to the building principal.

The revised policy now includes an outline of investigation procedures, which might include an interview with the complainant, the accused and others with knowledge of the incident.

The school principal now is required to prepare a written report summarizing the investigation and recommending disposition within 15 days, unless additional time is needed.

The policy requires the complainant and the accused to be informed of the outcome of the investigation.

Language requiring the district to take “prompt, corrective action” to any hazing incident to prevent further hazing now is included in the policy.

Changes to the foreign-exchange-student policy also were approved, but the changes are significantly smaller.

Policy changes specified that the school board can limit the number of foreign-exchange students admitted to the schools only based on space availably and qualifying criteria.

The policy now gives the superintendent the responsibility of recommending admission of any foreign-exchange students to the board.

Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7845 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.