Penn Hills man gets life sentence for killing, dismemberment |
Penn Hills

Penn Hills man gets life sentence for killing, dismemberment

An Allegheny County judge today sentenced a Penn Hills man to life without parole plus one to two years in prison for killing and dismembering another man.

A jury in March convicted Vito Pelino, 27, of first-degree murder and abuse of a corpse for killing William King, 23, of Penn Hills and chopping up his body to hide it on a wooded hillside in Plum.

Pelino apologized to King’s family, but several of King’s relatives said they can’t forgive his murder of a gentle, cheerful sports fanatic.

“This animal deserves the death penalty,” Michael King told Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski. “To be put to death like my brother was.”

Pelino was facing a mandatory life sentence on the murder conviction. Borkowski sentenced him to one to two years in prison on the misdemeanor charge of abusing a corpse.

Pelino killed King on Feb. 13, 2011, after finding him at Pelino’s sister’s apartment, police said. He gave King a ride from the apartment but, instead of taking King home, took him to a house Pelino’s mother owned in Verona where he stabbed King 72 times and then chopped up his body, police said.

Pelino said King’s death haunts him.

“I deserve every word of (Mark King’s) anger and his feelings toward me,” Pelino said.

Leo Robinson, King’s uncle, said Pelino is a monster.

“William was harmless,” he said. “In 23 years he was never in a fight.”

Doris Pryor, King’s grandmother, said after the hearing that knowing Pelino will spend the rest of his life in prison will help the family heal.

“(William) would have wanted us to move on,” she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.