ShareThis Page
Penn Hills School District pulls out of plans for vacant Aster Street property |
Penn Hills

Penn Hills School District pulls out of plans for vacant Aster Street property

| Thursday, October 25, 2018 1:24 p.m
The former library on Aster Street that was owned by the Penn Hills School District before its sale was approved in April 2018.

Penn Hills School District no longer is seeking permission to allow a potential buyer of an Aster Street property to use it as a car repair and storage shop.

Damian Buccilli, a Penn Hills municipal planner, said the Zoning Hearing Board voted unanimously Oct. 24 to approve the district’s withdrawal of its application.

The school district’s original application asked Penn Hills for a use variance to allow Steve Parco to operate the 234,000-square-foot facility as an auto repair shop and vehicle storage unit. Parco wanted to store 35 to 40 cars inside.

The school board approved the $62,000 sale to Parco, who owns an auto repair shop on Rodi Road in Penn Hills, in April.

District solicitor Craig Alexander wrote in the application, “due to peculiarities of the property, it has been unable to be sold for any permitted use in the present zoning application. Additionally, the property is in significant disrepair, with significant roof damage, mold, etc.”

The municipality’s planning department recommended denying the use variance in September. That prompted the school to ask the municipality to delay voting on the issue.

Penn Hills Superintendent Nancy Hines was not immediately available to comment.

Buccilli said the vacant property at 260 Aster St. — a former Penn Hills library until the school district bought it in 2007 — will continue to be unoccupied until a new use or readmission is sought.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.