Penn Hills to consider hiring real estate agent to market old municipal building |
Penn Hills

Penn Hills to consider hiring real estate agent to market old municipal building

Dillon Carr
Dillon Carr | Tribune-Review
The old Penn Hills administrative building at 12247 Frankstown Road.

Penn Hills council is looking to hire Michael Pirollo to market the municipality’s old administrative building on Frankstown Road.

The municipality began looking for a real estate firm to sell the building it’s owned since 1937 in October. Manager Scott Andrejchak said there were three firms that submitted proposals.

“So we had some interviews and the staff recommended Pirollo,” Andrejchak said.

Pirollo is a real estate agent for Keller Williams Commercial. He also owns Dream Photography in Penn Hills.

Penn Hills staff, including police and EMS departments, moved to a new building at 102 Duff Road in July and August. The $12.3 million complex includes a 43,200-square-foot municipal and police building, and a 9,000-square-foot emergency services building. It also will have a firefighter training area.

The old building, located at 12245 Frankstown Road, had housed police, EMS and administrative staff since 1968. It sits on around an acre of land and is valued at nearly $2.3 million, according to real estate records.

Council will also consider allowing Craig Alexander, the municipality’s solicitor, to appeal the site’s assessed value with Allegheny County.

“Any reduction in the assessed valuation may make the property more marketable to potential buyers by having an assessment that (is) closer to real market value,” reads the resolution on council’s agenda for a Dec. 17 meeting.

The council meeting will start at 7 p.m. at 102 Duff Road on Dec. 17.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.