Archive

ShareThis Page
Penn Hills councilman announces bid for mayor | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Penn Hills councilman announces bid for mayor

Dillon Carr
579229phpmayorbid010319
Submitted
John Petrucci

A Penn Hills councilman wants to be the municipality’s next mayor.

John Petrucci, 57, a Democrat of Penn Hills, announced Dec. 27 his intentions to run for mayor of Penn Hills, a position that expires in 2020 and is currently held by Sara Kuhn.

Kuhn, a Democrat, has said she will not run for re-election. She was deputy mayor for 11 years before serving as Penn Hills’ second female mayor.

Petrucci ran unopposed in 2017 for his current seat on Penn Hills Council, which expires in 2021. The retired law enforcement officer with the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Department ran unsuccessfully for district judge in 2015.

“I want to continue the work that I already started,” Petrucci said. “I want to continue to work for the community and the residents and being their voice in local government.”

He said he wants to establish fire, EMS and veterans memorials as followups to his work tgetting the municipality’s police memorial moved to the new government complex property.

No one else has announced a mayoral bid to date. Candidates have until March 26 to file nomination petitions, according to Allegheny County Elections Division.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.