1 dead in Port Vue apartment fire as thick smoke keeps police officer at bay |

1 dead in Port Vue apartment fire as thick smoke keeps police officer at bay

A Port Vue Police lieutenant tried to rescue a man trapped in a two-alarm fire Monday morning but was driven back by thick smoke and flames, he said.

Port Vue Police Lt. David Petruski said he was the first to arrive at the San Juan Drive apartment building scene shortly after the 10:15 a.m. 911 call and found a woman outside saying that her brother was still in their first-floor apartment. From outside the smoke was light, but as he entered flames were shooting out of the apartment, and the building was impassably smoky.

“I only got a few feet in, but the smoke was black, billowing and really thick,” Petruski said. As he retreated, he could hear explosions inside from oxygen tanks the man used.

Firefighters arrived shortly afterward, Petruski said. The fire appeared to have started in the living room at the front of the apartment, though he could not say how.

The man inside the apartment died, and his name had not yet been released by the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office as of early Monday afternoon. Medics transported two other people from other units in the two-story brick apartment complex to local hospitals to be treated for smoke inhalation.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724 836 6660, [email protected] or on Twitter @msantoni.

One person died in a two-alarm fire in an apartment building on San Juan Drive Monday, Oct. 30, 2017, in Port Vue.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.