ShareThis Page
12 from Western Pa. indicted, charged with being part of drug ring |

12 from Western Pa. indicted, charged with being part of drug ring


Twelve people have been indicted by a federal grand jury, charged with being part of a drug distribution ring.

According to prosecutors, from about September 2016 and continuing to about July 2017, the defendants conspired to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute 400 grams or more of fentanyl and a quantity of heroin.

According to U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady, those charged are:

Shawn Hendrix, 42, of Cranberry

Nikia Perkins, 44, of Monaca

Adrian Jordan, 28, of Braddock

Leroy George, 49, of Johnstown

Thomas Hannon, 36, of Aliquippa

Aleece Bowser, 32, of Monaca

Ashley Miller, 33, of Aliquippa

Carlisha Williams, 29, of Aliquippa

Sheila Alford, 61, of Aliquippa

Michael Henry, 36, of McKeesport

Jeremy Fooks, 32, of Pittsburgh

Terry Johnson, 34, of McKees Rocks

Prosecutors said Hendrix, Perkins, Jordan, Bowser, Miller, Williams and Alford are charged with possession with the intent to distribute fentanyl or carfentanyl, and/or attempts to possess fentanyl with the intent to sell it.

Fooks is further charged with possession of ammunition by a convicted felon.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert C. Schupansky is prosecuting this case.

This prosecution is part of a long-term investigation by the FBI Greater Pittsburgh Safe Streets Task Force, which targeted what it called a large-scale drug trafficking organization operating in Butler, Beaver and Allegheny counties.

Assisting were officers from the Wilkinsburg Police Department, state Attorney General’s Bureau of Narcotics Investigations, Allegheny County sheriff’s deputies and county police officers and the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police.

Also contributing to the case were state police, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Cranberry Township and New Brighton police.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.