Archive

ShareThis Page
15-year-old Pittsburgh boy shot in North Braddock dies | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

15-year-old Pittsburgh boy shot in North Braddock dies

486486webambulance

A 15-year-old boy shot in the head earlier this month in North Braddock has died, officials said.

Chammaire Smith of Pittsburgh was pronounced dead about 12:45 p.m. Tuesday at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office said.

Smith died of a gunshot wound, the medical examiner said. Police believe another boy shot him.

Shortly before 10 a.m. on Nov. 18, officials received 911 calls about a person who was shot and needed medical assistance near Walnut Alley, county police said.

Police and paramedics arrived to find the victim, later identified as Smith, suffering from a single gunshot wound to the head. Investigators said they believe he had been shot on Cliff Street. He was taken to a hospital and initially listed in critical condition.

The same day, police arrested Taymar Smith , 15, and charged him as an adult with aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person and weapons violations.

No additional charges had been filed against Smith as of Tuesday night.

Smith is being held in Allegheny County Jail on $100,000 bail. His preliminary hearing has been scheduled for Friday.

Officials asked anyone with information about the incident to call the county police tipline at 833-255-8477. Callers can remain anonymous.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.