ShareThis Page
3 from Allegheny County charged with Medicaid fraud |

3 from Allegheny County charged with Medicaid fraud

| Monday, August 31, 2015 4:33 p.m

Three Allegheny County residents are accused of taking thousands of dollars for acting as personal care assistants for their loved ones but billing Medicaid for services they did not perform, the state Attorney General’s Office said Monday.

Danielle Glover, 37, of Sheraden; Richard Palmer, 32, of Hazelwood; and Kena Powe, 35, of McKees Rocks are charged with one count of Medicaid fraud and theft by deception. Powe also is charged with forgery.

Authorities said Glover worked as a personal care assistant for her grandmother until August 2013, but she submitted time sheets until November 2013 and was paid $4,000 for services she did not perform.

Palmer, authorities said, worked as a personal care assistant for his mother. He submitted time sheets totaling $2,300 showing that he cared for her between May and June 2013 while she was hospitalized and then at an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

Powe was a personal care assistant for her father. Investigators said she submitted time sheets totaling $4,000 for services from May to July 2013, even though her father had hired a personal care assistant in May 2013.

Deputy Attorney General Edward Song will prosecute the cases.

The three arrests in Allegheny County were among six the Attorney General’s Office announced Monday. Of the three others, two were in Philadelphia. One was in Montgomery County.

All of the arrests were the result of investigations by the attorney general’s Medicaid Fraud Control Section.

Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.