3rd ‘Scream’ mask robbery this month reported in Shadyside |

3rd ‘Scream’ mask robbery this month reported in Shadyside


A third woman reported she was robbed by a man wearing a “Scream” mask this week, Pittsburgh police said.

The incident happened about 11:50 p.m. Sunday on Howe Street in Pittsburgh’s Shadyside neighborhood, said Public Safety spokeswoman Alicia George.

The woman told police she was walking on Howe Street toward Ivy Street when a man wearing a ghost mask popularized by the movie series “Scream” emerged from the bushes and robbed her of her belongings, George said.

Two similar incidents happened within a short time of one another on Sept. 17.

In the first, the victim told police she was walking on Walnut Street when a man wearing a Scream mask tried to take her cell phone, police said. When the suspect was unsuccessfully, he pulled out a gun and took off with the woman’s belongings.

A second woman told police she’d been walking in the same area when a man in a Scream mask approached and demanded her things, police said.

Police are urging residents in the area to be alert and be aware of anyone who appears suspicious. The suggested keeping porch lights turned on and to remain alert, particularly after dark.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.