Archive

Active member of Dor Hadash congregation ID’d by brother as victim of Squirrel Hill shooting | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Active member of Dor Hadash congregation ID’d by brother as victim of Squirrel Hill shooting

Bob Bauder
386875PTRShooting19102818
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Flowers are left near the scene of a mass shooting at Tree of Life Synagogue in Squirrel Hill on Oct. 27, 2018.

Daniel Leger opens the door every day at the Tree of Life synagogue to get it ready for the day’s services.

On Saturday, as he prepared to lead a service at the Squirrel Hill place of worship, Leger became one of the victims of alleged shooter Robert D. Bowers.

Leger, 70, of Squirrel Hill suffered critical injuries in his chest, his brother, Paul Leger, told the Tribune-Review.

“The doctors are cautiously optimistic,” said Leger, board chairman of the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority.

Daniel Leger, described as a very active member of the Dor Hadash congregation, is a retired nurse and UPMC Chaplain, his brother said.

Paul Leger said his brother was coming out of a second surgery.

“I don’t think it really quite struck home. This is something like on TV,” Paul Leger said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.