Allegheny County ethics policy revision prompts debate |

Allegheny County ethics policy revision prompts debate

Aaron Aupperlee

An Allegheny County councilwoman wants to strengthen the county’s take-home vehicle policy in the wake of allegations that the county executive misused his taxpayer-funded Jeep.

Councilwoman Heather Heidelbaugh, R-Mt. Lebanon, said she will re-introduce legislation by the end of the year that specifically bans county employees from using county vehicles for political purposes.

The current county Code of Accountability, Conduct and Ethics only states that employees cannot use county resources except for county purposes. Heidelbaugh thinks the law needs clarification.

“I don’t think people ought to be using government property for political purposes. Period. End of story,” Heidelbaugh said.

She had similar legislation on council’s Oct. 21 agenda but pulled the bill to tighten and square it with state and federal laws.

Her comments were made after county Controller Chelsa Wagner on Thursday accused county Executive Rich Fitzgerald of using his county-provided 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee to attend at least 100 political or personal events. Wagner, 37, of Point Breeze called on Fitzgerald to repay the county at least $13,000 for miles put on the Jeep during these events and for nearly 20,000 unaccounted-for miles.

Fitzgerald, 55, of Squirrel Hill said he conducts county business while attending political events and called Wagner’s attacks political. Both are Democrats. Spokeswoman Amie Downs declined to comment on Heidelbaugh’s potential legislation, which has not been finalized or submitted to council.

Councilman Michael Finnerty, D-Scott, doubted Heidelbaugh’s legislation has much chance of passing. He said the county’s current ethics laws are strong enough and defended Fitzgerald’s use of the county Jeep.

“You go to a political event, say in Carnegie, and maybe you talk about flood control,” Finnerty said. “At the same time, if someone is driving, you can get a lot of work done as you ride along.”

Paul T. Lauria, president of Mercury Associates, a fleet management consulting firm based in Rockville, Md., said county officials should be careful not to overreact to Wagner’s accusations. Often, take-home vehicles save money and increase efficiency, he said.

“The key thing is for organizations not to have a knee-jerk reaction. What appears to be malfeasance or an inappropriate use of taxpayer dollars may not be,” Lauria said.

“He’s running an $800 million enterprise, and people are questioning whether it’s OK for him to have a county-provided vehicle? … Why are we even having this conversation?”

Heidelbaugh, who often spars with Fitzgerald when he speaks before council, said she would like to see an ethics investigation into his vehicle use. Robert Caruso, director of the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission, said he could not comment on whether his office has started an investigation as Wagner requested.

Aaron Aupperlee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7986 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.