Allegheny County Police Association opposes countywide review board |

Allegheny County Police Association opposes countywide review board

A group of around 500 protesters confront Pittsburgh Police by kneeling and raising their hands chanting ‘Hands Up,’ on Pittsburgh’s South Side, Saturday, June 23, 2018, to protest East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld’s fatal shooting of 17-year-old Antwon Rose.

The Allegheny County Police Association is opposing a proposal to establish a countywide citizens’ police review board.

“We have the Allegheny County district attorney, we have our internal policies, we have our command staff, we have cameras and microphones in our cars, we have an internal complaint process, an external complaint process,” Benjamin Thornton, president of the association, told the county council Tuesday. “All this is widely publicized. You can stop in and speak to any supervisor and initiate a complaint to allege wrongdoing. For all these reasons, my organization is opposed to the formation of a civilian review board, especially when it affects such a small portion of the county and that would be the Allegheny County police department.”

The county’s police association has about 220 members, according to Thornton.

County police patrol the airports and county parks, and county detectives investigate homicides outside the City of Pittsburgh.

“I am not surprised by it nor am I dismayed by it,”said Councilman DeWitt Walton, D-Hill District, of the opposition. “I believe the effort (to create the board) has broader support than detractors and will move forward.”

Council voted last month to take the first step toward creating a countywide citizens’ police review board in the wake of the June 19 fatal shooting of unarmed teen Antwon Rose by East Pittsburgh Officer Michael Rosfeld.

Walton and Paul Klein, D-Point Breeze, are holding meetings to get public input on the idea.

If county council creates the board, the elected bodies of the municipalities that govern all the police departments would have to individually vote to be overseen by the board, Walton has said.

The Pittsburgh Citizen Police Review Board oversees the city police, but no such body exists for county police or the other nearly 120 police departments within the county.

Public meetings to gain input on the idea are scheduled for: Aug. 29 at the Hill House Association; Aug. 30 at the Millvale Community Center; Sept. 20 in Duquesne and Sept. 26 in McKees Rocks, Walton said. All meetings are open to all county residents and will run from 5:30 to 7 p.m.

Council plans to consider whether to create the board no later than Oct. 23.

This story has been updated with a new date for the second September meeting.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, [email protected] or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.