ShareThis Page
ATM company manager accused of stealing $24K |

ATM company manager accused of stealing $24K

| Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:30 p.m

A preliminary hearing is scheduled Tuesday for the Pittsburgh branch manager of the company that repairs and maintains ATMs at Rivers Casino who is accused of stealing nearly $24,000 from the automated tellers.

David Alan Cauvel, 49, of McKean, Erie County, was charged with theft and receiving stolen property after state police said they recovered $23,800 in his pants pocket and in his truck parked in the bus lobby of Rivers Casino on July 24.

Cauvel and another employee of Texas-based Loomis came to the North Shore casino to conduct an audit of an ATM after a man called the company to say his wife had requested three $20 bills from the automated teller and instead received three $100 bills.

The other employee removed four money cassettes from the ATM and found the $20 trays contained $20 bills and the $100 trays contained $100 bills, state police said.

According to the criminal complaint:

The employee gave the trays to Cauvel, who is his boss, to run the cash through a money counter in the vehicle. Halfway through a stack of $100 bills, the employee noticed some of the cash had been replaced by $20 bills.

After returning the cassettes to the ATM, the employee contacted casino security.

Troopers searched Cauvel and found $100 bills totaling $3,700 in his pants pocket. They found another $20,100 inside the vehicle.

Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.