Beechview man pleads guilty to poisoning stray cats for pooping in his yard |

Beechview man pleads guilty to poisoning stray cats for pooping in his yard


A Beechview man pleaded guilty Monday in Allegheny County Court to using mothballs to poison and kill six cats from a stray “colony” his neighbors were caring for because he was tired of the cats pooping in his yard and on the sidewalk.

Daniel T. Smith, 44, pleaded guilty to six counts of animal cruelty, a first-degree misdemeanor, before Common Pleas Judge Kevin G. Sasinoski. The judge will impose a sentence Dec. 7. Smith faces up to 5 years in prison on each count.

Smith’s attorney, Sally Frick, declined to comment on the case except to note that napthalene, the poison found in some of the dead cats, was a common ingredient in mothballs available for purchase around the country.

According to a criminal complaint by Pittsburgh police Officer Christine Luffey, Smith placed two dead cats in a neighbor’s trash can in July 2015. Neighbors recognized the dead cats as coming from the group of stray cats they cared for, the complaint said. A third cat from the group appeared to be sick and was euthanized at a veterinarian’s office.

All but a few of the cats in the colony, two of which were tame enough for the neighbors to take into their home, eventually died or disappeared. They had previously been captured, vaccinated, tagged and re-released through Animal Friends.

In an argument about a month and a half later, Smith allegedly told one of the neighbors, “I killed six or eight of your cats, and I’ll kill the rest of them,” the complaint said.

Luffey wrote that she interviewed Smith and he complained about the stray cats his neighbors had been feeding, and said he was tired of finding cat poop on his sidewalk and in his yard.

“It’s not illegal for me to own mothballs and put them in my yard. … If the cats stepped on or ate mothballs and poison got into their body, it’s not my problem,” Smith said, according to Luffey’s complaint.

Even if the cats were feral, Luffey told him, poisoning them was illegal. She told him that he should have called Animal Control or used non-lethal traps to capture the cats and turn them over to shelters, the complaint said.

The Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office crime lab agreed to test samples from one of the dead cats’ stomachs and found it contained napthalene, which is poisonous to cats if ingested.

Mike Manko, spokesman for the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office, said Smith’s charges predated the toughening of Pennsylvania’s animal-cruelty laws that took effect this summer. Identical circumstances would now result in a felony charge, Manko said.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6660, [email protected] or via Twitter @msantoni.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.