ShareThis Page
Beltzhoover man sentenced to 10-20 years for manslaughter |

Beltzhoover man sentenced to 10-20 years for manslaughter

| Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:48 p.m.
Trenton 'Tony' Knight, 27, of Rankin
Trenton 'Tony' Knight, 27, of Rankin

Trenton Knight said he would not have been in Jefferson Hills the night of May 16, 2015, had he known the woman he was sleeping with was Darius Williams’ live-in girlfriend.

But Williams came home that night and used a knife to force open the door of a bedroom where Knight was hiding. Knight fatally shot Williams, 40, and fled the scene in his underwear; he was arrested 12 days later by U.S. marshals and convicted of voluntary manslaughter in April.

“I was lied to and put in a situation where I had to protect myself. If I’d known it was his house, I wouldn’t have put myself in that situation,” Knight, 27, of Beltzhoover told Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Thomas Flaherty and Williams’ family at his sentencing Tuesday. “To the family of Darius Williams, I’m sorry. This wasn’t my intention.”

Flaherty sentenced Knight to 10 to 20 years in prison, noting that the state’s “three-strike” law made 10 to 20 years the mandatory minimum sentence for Knight’s second strike. A 2009 robbery conviction was his first. Knight faces 25 years to life if he commits a third violent crime.

On a second conviction, for illegally possessing a firearm, Flaherty sentenced Knight to five to 10 years in prison but made it concurrent to the manslaughter sentence.

Williams’ aunts and mother were in court Tuesday to give victim-impact statements and ask Flaherty to make the sentences consecutive.

“There’s not a miracle that could happen to ease my pain,” said Williams’ mother, Betty Williams Tallon. “Darius went into his home and was murdered by an intruder.”

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5625 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.