Blackjacks off the table for Pittsburgh police |

Blackjacks off the table for Pittsburgh police

Pittsburgh police acting Chief Cameron McLay said Thursday that in his 35 years of police work, he hadn’t seen active-duty officers carry the 6-inch, leather-wrapped metal weapons known as blackjacks.

Then he arrived in Pittsburgh.

“I saw more than I liked,” said McLay, who this week banned the weapon effective immediately. “The image, the professionalism of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police is not well-served by our officers carrying a device like the blackjack.”

The blackjacks are leather-wrapped lead, originally designed to hit someone in the head to knock the person unconscious without cutting him, McLay said.

“That has long been a very, very inappropriate use-of-force tactic,” he said.

Pittsburgh officers carried blackjacks for decades, said former police Chief Robert W. McNeilly Jr., who considered banning them when he headed the bureau from 1996 to 2006.

“I was issued one in 1977, and every officer that came on decades before me carried one,” McNeilly said. He ordered officers to undergo a four-hour training program to use the blackjacks.

Pittsburgh police officers were taught to use them as they would other impact weapons such as the expandable baton or straight baton, primarily for hitting muscle groups such as in the arms or legs.

Department statistics suggest officers rarely use blackjacks. A use-of-force report for 2013 said officers used either blackjacks or batons — the report lumps them together — in just 1.54 percent of 2,727 times in which they employed some type of force.

“Before I started, I looked at the policy manual and approved weaponry,” McLay said. “I noticed blackjacks were still there, and that was an issue of concern before I even walked in the door.”

McLay said he couldn’t estimate how many city officers carry blackjacks, but said he noticed them when he visited the police stations.

“Because of the appearance of the tool, and because the device was originally designed to strike the head … I consider the tool to be an anachronism for law enforcement,” McLay said. “A modern police agency does not need to be carrying a blackjack.”

Thomas Aveni, a retired officer and executive director of the Police Policy Studies Council, said he thought use of blackjacks by police departments was a “dead topic.”

“Most agencies phased those out two decades ago,” Aveni said. “The problem with them was they encouraged strikes to the head. They didn’t give you much advantage in reach the way a regular baton would.”

Pittsburgh officers carry batons, Tasers and pepper spray as nonlethal weapon options.

“The only attraction left for the blackjack is the emotional appeal for it,” McLay said. “They’ve had it for a very, very long time. The other tools we have are better and safer.”

Margaret Harding is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.